During the last few months I did test it, so there are no sensational news on the improvement of the sound due to the running of cables. How
additional remarks to the previous post, I remember that often, going up one rung on the ladder of the quality of the electronics, what is more noticeable is removed the sound, rather than what is added and not noticed that before.
seems incredible, but I would not be the first to admit that the sound of the CD is actually more fat than it should be, that artificially inflated for look nicer or more aggressive, according to the will of the producers of the disc.
The evidence of these statements are spent listening to HD. suddenly disappear a number of characteristics of the incision that they assumed they vanish or are relocated in space.
The analogy might be the move from a cheap CD player to a medium-high: usually cheap CDs tend to "scream", that is to bring up all the performers, regardless of spatial location, then flattening the sound stage. More
increases the quality, the sound stage becomes more defined and many sounds fade into the background, giving the feeling of "wasting" of sound, which in reality is simply greater fidelity.
The difference is that, with high definition, this happens even if the same source , or DAC in our case: it is enough to feed the DAC with two versions of the same track at different resolutions.
Personally I tried with "Got To Get You Into My Life" in Retrospective Christy Baron (Chesky), made available on a 16/44 version of the sampler cut from the same master to 24/96. Yesterday I
Listened to all the Nutcracker version Philips, at the time considered audiophile. Nothing to be done after the plays hi-def, go back to the old CD is very difficult.
Even the legendary Star Tracks of Telarc, recorded at the dawn of digital technology with the Sony PCM 1610 , one of the best albums of the existing starting to show signs of age, made more evident by the new technologies, particularly signals with low intensity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment